1. About.com
  2. Entertainment
  3. 80s Music

Discuss in my forum

Steve Peake

KISS Should Be in the Rock and Hall of Fame By Now - Period

By , About.com Guide   July 13, 2009

Follow me on:

kissdynasty.jpg The debate continues to rage on as to whether legendary '70s (and workhorse '80s) hard rock band KISS has been thus far snubbed for inclusion by the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame. I say the answer is yes, and I'll now proceed to make a strong and simple case for this position that matches the stripped-down appeal of the majority of this group's massive musical output. Despite some undoubtedly silly lyrical posturing - most of which relies on subtle-as-a-sequined-purple-sledgehammer sexual innuendo - KISS has produced a body of music, especially during its peak period of activity during the above-mentioned decades, that stands the test of time exceptionally well and often exemplifies the quintessential spirit of rebellion inherent in rock and roll since its inception. The fact that the sometimes vapid Van Halen was inducted only four years after that band became eligible for enshrinement and KISS remains outside looking in 35 years after the release of its influential debut album could be enough on its own to make my point.

But I can go on. The ability of KISS to maximize its commercial possibilities can seem cynical, but there's no denying that group masterminds Paul Stanley and Gene Simmons are highly intelligent and driven in the arena of grand entertainment. So what if no one's ever going to mistake KISS artistically for a band the caliber of the Beatles, Rolling Stones or the Band? For one thing, the group is closer than many think to a similar kind of genius, and in terms of influence, sheer popularity, longevity, and productivity, there are only a handful of bands in rock history that can dream of rivalling the truth, myth and legend of KISS. Check out some of the links below for more '80s-centered KISS content if you feel like you still need convincing.

Album Cover Image Courtesy of Island Def Jam

Comments

July 13, 2009 at 10:15 pm
(1) Jay :

KISS as a musical entity represents the hallmark of mediocrity. If there’s ever a Hall Of Fame for shilling a shiddy band to pubescent wanna-be rockers, they should win that award, but that’s about it.

July 15, 2009 at 10:42 am
(2) Kenneth Bays :

Van Halen always felt to me like there was at least some attempt at artistry taking place (plus, in the DLR years, a sense of humor). KISS, on the other hand, felt (to me) designed for a quick buck and little else — as though they were more interested in the psychology of marketing than in pop artistry. And despite the flamboyance, they were ultimately pretty humorless.

July 19, 2009 at 1:59 am
(3) Derek :

In my mind Rush deserve a place in the Hall of Fame just as much as Kiss do. Whilst Kiss had the show to go with sometimes ordinary music, Rush have had a 30+ year career of top quality music.

July 19, 2009 at 11:55 am
(4) PatKat :

I agree! I grew up on KISS and always felt they should get more honors as musicians. All hail KISS!

July 19, 2009 at 3:24 pm
(5) karen :

I agree with Derek, if anyone belongs in the Hall its RUSH…

July 20, 2009 at 5:15 am
(6) joe :

the fact they are still around today means they deserve a place!

Leave a Comment


Line and paragraph breaks are automatic. Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title="">, <b>, <i>, <strike>
Related Searches hall of fame kiss

©2012 About.com. All rights reserved. 

A part of The New York Times Company.